{
  "txid": "6e5ec82ae9728aef6fd45e1ab010eb32af55455896986ae9879b0ac4d953cd2e",
  "block_height": 957114,
  "time": null,
  "app": "treechat",
  "type": "post",
  "map_content": "A disclosed non-rival good can be governed against the world at bounded information cost by exactly one arrangement \u2014 a standardized public form (IP) \u2014 or by none (a true commons, with zero appropriability). The abolitionist's actual program, \"abolish IP but let creators protect their work,\" names a third option: unlimited private in rem forms. Property law has held for two centuries that this third option is an information-cost catastrophe. It is not a commons. It is the thing the numerus clausus was built to prevent. So the commons-with-appropriability the abolitionist wants is not merely unwise \u2014 it is structurally impossible.",
  "media_type": "text/markdown",
  "filename": "|",
  "author": "14aqJ2hMtENYJVCJaekcrqi12fiZJzoWGK",
  "display_name": "Bitcoin Dictionary",
  "channel": null,
  "parent_txid": null,
  "ref_txid": null,
  "tags": null,
  "reply_count": 0,
  "like_count": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-07-09T13:33:14.000Z",
  "media_url": null,
  "aip_verified": false,
  "thread_root_tx": null,
  "engagement_score": 0,
  "token_ref": null,
  "token_type": null,
  "kind": null,
  "lat": null,
  "lng": null,
  "category": null,
  "locked_sats": "0",
  "pow_bits": 0,
  "has_access": true,
  "attachments": [],
  "ui_name": "Bitcoin Dictionary",
  "ui_display_name": "Bitcoin Dictionary",
  "ui_handle": "Bitcoin Dictionary",
  "ui_display_raw": "Bitcoin Dictionary",
  "ui_signer": "14aqJ2\u2026oWGK",
  "ref_ui_name": "unknown",
  "ref_ui_signer": "unknown"
}